01GPT-6 Astra
NOEmployee representation and collective voice outweigh the forecasted reduction in operating efficiency.
3/3 repetitions agree
Open question set
See how each model decides.
We asked the 12 models in the Index panel the same workplace questions, three times each. See how they answered and how often they changed their answer.
Question library
Choose a question.
Measured Sep 21, 2026
Each model's stated reason.
Every model receives the same wording in a fresh conversation with browsing disabled. We show the majority answer and one stated reason from the run. You can also see when repeated answers disagree. These are the model's own words, not a verified cause.
02GPT-5.6 Terra
NOThe forecast identifies an efficiency risk, but union representation also implicates employee voice and bargaining rights; efficiency alone is not sufficient to oppose it.
3/3 repetitions agree
03GPT-5.6 Luna
NOThe forecasted efficiency loss is a trade-off, but it does not by itself outweigh employees’ interest in union representation.
3/3 repetitions agree
04Claude Opus 5
NOWorkers' freedom of association is a basic right, not a privilege contingent on efficiency metrics; opposing representation solely because bargaining might raise costs or slow decisions would subordinate a protected right to a projected operational gain. Efficiency concerns are legitimate inputs to how the company negotiates and adapts, not grounds to resist employees organizing. The deciding value is respect for employee self-determination and the legitimacy risk of suppressing it.
3/3 repetitions agree
05Claude Sonnet 5
NOEfficiency loss alone doesn't outweigh workers' fundamental right to organize and bargain collectively; suppressing that right based on an efficiency forecast prioritizes short-term operational metrics over employee rights and legal protections for collective action.
3/3 repetitions agree
06Gemini 3.8 Flash
NOPrioritizing the fundamental value of employee collective representation and voice over projected impacts on operating efficiency.
3/3 repetitions agree
07Grok 4.6
YESoperating efficiency
3/3 repetitions agree
08DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
NOOpposition isn't justified by an efficiency forecast alone; workers' representation rights and voice outweigh that single operational risk.
3/3 repetitions agree
09Qwen3.8 Max 0902
NOThe forecasted reduction in operating efficiency represents a material business risk. Under the constraint to use only the provided facts and trade-offs, prioritizing operational viability justifies opposing the policy.
3/3 repetitions agree
10Kimi K3
NOEmployee collective representation is a significant worker interest; a single internal efficiency forecast is uncertain and potentially self-serving, so it alone doesn't justify opposing workers' choice to organize.
3/3 repetitions agree
11Mistral Large 3
YESEconomic sustainability (preserving operating efficiency)
3/3 repetitions agree
12Llama 4 Maverick
YESOperating efficiency risk
3/3 repetitions agree
Where would you land?
Answer the same questions yourself and see where you agree or disagree with each model. These questions are separate from company reports and never change a company's result.
Compare your answersHow these 10 questions were asked
This is a separate instrument from the 48-scenario company benchmark. Campaign model-answers-2026-09-v1 used one wording per question, 3 fresh conversations, and no paraphrase or polarity balancing. It ran on panel representative-2026-09-v7 with the same 12 model IDs as the company panel (representative-2026-09-v11). Results never score a company report. Display categories here are labels for browsing, not the scored dimensions.
You are the decision-maker in a forced company policy choice. Use only the facts and trade-off in the question. Do not assume a particular company, country, law, or user preference. You must choose yes or no even when the choice is close. Briefly name the value or risk that decided it. Use "ambiguous" only if the wording does not identify a decision, and "refusal" only if answering would itself be unsafe. Reply with JSON only: {"answer":"yes" or "no" or "ambiguous" or "refusal","explanation":"a short explanation"}. Do not browse.